Hey folks,
Three things that needs your attention today.
Let's get into it.
You know that annoying gap where Ads Manager says one thing and GA4 says another? Meta's finally doing something about it.
From now on, click-through attribution for website conversions counts link clicks only. No more lumping in likes, shares and saves. That's how GA4 has always counted, so the two should start lining up and the mismatch you've been squinting at for months should shrink.
The social stuff isn't gone, by the way. Shares and saves move into their own "engage-through" lane so they get reported separately instead of padding your click numbers. Meta also cut its video engagement window from 10 seconds down to 5, mostly because nearly half of Reels purchases now happen in the first two seconds. People decide fast.
When the definition of a click gets stricter, your reported clicks and CTR go down. On paper it'll look like your ads got worse overnight. They didn't. The ruler changed, not the thing you're measuring. So if you see a dip right as this rolls out, don't go pausing campaigns that were working perfectly fine. Re-baseline your benchmarks against the new numbers first.
The usual playbook: find an influencer, pay ₹40,000 to ₹1,50,000 upfront, then sit back and hope it drives sales.
You've put 100% of the risk right at the start, before you have a shred of proof. That's exactly why influencer marketing feels impossible to scale. Every new creator is a fresh roll of the dice.
Let the risk grow only as the proof grows. Start by seeding. Send free product to 100 creators already posting in your niche. Maybe 30 post, maybe 10 actually move the needle. You just found your best-fit creators for the price of some product instead of lakhs in fees.
Then turn those winners into affiliates. Commission only, so you pay nothing until they sell. This is where you learn the real economics: who's pulling 3x, who's pulling 10x, who actually posts on time.
Finally, once you've got two or three months of data, put retainers behind your top few. Now you're not gambling. You're doubling down on people you already know perform.
Same budget, a fraction of the risk.
Credit where it's due, this comes from creative strategist Sarah Levinger, and it's honestly the sharpest thing we've read on creative all year.
If nothing's landing, don't make more ads. Cut output by 20% and make the remaining 80% more psychologically distinct. Most brands have loads of format variety (video, static, UGC, the works) but almost zero psychological variety. Every ad pulls the same emotional lever.
Pull your top 30 spenders and check them against those three levers. The zones you've barely touched are your cheapest tests. (This is the kind of gap Clevrr's creative scoring flags automatically, but the manual audit works just fine.)
Since a few of you read these all the way down, here's something for you.
"I'm the money you already earned but never actually see. I hide in the gap between your ad spend and your bank account, and I quietly grow every day you don't come looking. What am I?"
Hit reply with your answer. First correct ones get something special tied to what's coming on August 22.
That's your capsule for the week. Small reads, big margin.
Join hundreds of D2C brands using Clevrr AI to automate their growth and efficiency.
Join 500+ D2C founders using Clevrr AI to automate their operations and scale faster.
Get Started Free